Skip to content

Feasibility + due diligence / New Jersey

Read the property before the larger commitment.

Architectural feasibility turns a general opportunity into a defined set of property, building, use, and next-step questions.

Existing vacant infill parcel between low industrial buildings in Kearny, New Jersey.
13 Arlington / Kearny, New JerseyExisting condition / Feasibility study record
Useful before
Purchase / Lease / Reuse / Addition / Development
Possible work
Records / Site walk / Test fit / Findings / Next scope
Result
A documented architectural basis for the next decision

The purpose

Find the first questions, not every answer.

A property can look workable and still carry gaps in its record, use, access, egress, structure, systems, approvals, or existing conditions. A study makes those questions visible while there is still time to investigate them.

The scope should match the decision. A short document review may be enough for one question. Another property may require a site walk, municipal records, consultant input, and a test fit before the architectural position is useful.

Questions to frame

What the study may need to resolve.

The list is selected for the actual property and intended use. It is not a substitute for discipline-specific review.

01

The intended use

What needs to happen on the property, how much space it requires, and which parts of the building or site are essential to the program.

02

The available record

Which surveys, approvals, occupancy records, drawings, reports, leases, and municipal documents exist—and which version is current.

03

The visible condition

What a site or building walk can show about access, circulation, egress, accessibility, structure, enclosure, systems, and prior alterations.

04

The review path

Which zoning, code, change-of-use, approval, consultant, testing, or record questions require confirmation before the project advances.

05

The decision date

What must be known before a lease, closing, application, budget decision, or larger design commission—and when that decision is due.

06

The next scope

Whether the work should stop with findings, continue into a test fit or concept, or move into a separately defined project phase.

A possible sequence

Move from record to decision.

Not every commission includes every step. Scope, access, schedule, deliverables, and consultant input are agreed first.

  1. 01

    Frame the decision

    State the property, intended use, commitment being considered, target date, and the question the study must answer.

  2. 02

    Assemble the record

    Review the documents made available and identify missing, inconsistent, outdated, or unconfirmed information that matters to the architectural question.

  3. 03

    Read the property

    Compare the intended use with the observable building and site conditions within the agreed level of review.

  4. 04

    Test the fit

    Develop the commissioned diagrams, test fit, site study, massing, or other work needed to make the question specific.

  5. 05

    Record findings + next steps

    Distinguish what the study supports, what remains open, who should address it, and what scope would follow if the project continues.

Project evidence

One narrow lot. A specific test.

The project record states exactly what was studied and what has not been represented.

Proposed / Feasibility + concept design

13 Arlington

A 4,174-square-foot, two-story study for a vacant 25 × 115-foot industrial lot in Kearny. It tests flex/industrial space at grade, office above, access, frontage, and identified bulk relief. No approval, permit, construction, or completion is represented.

Read the project record

Decision guide / New Jersey industrial property

Records to request before leasing or buying

A source-backed guide to approvals, occupancy records, drawings, building systems, environmental history, and flood data. The guide explains what to request; it does not replace review of a specific property.

Read the decision guide

What the study is not

Feasibility is not approval.

Architectural due diligence is limited to the documents, access, observations, assumptions, date, and services stated in the agreement and findings. It does not reveal concealed conditions or establish the accuracy of information supplied by others.

It is not a survey, title review, environmental assessment, specialty engineering report, cost guarantee, legal opinion, municipal approval, permit, or certification of code compliance unless that work is expressly included and performed by the appropriate qualified party.

Start a review

Bring the address and the decision date.

Share the intended use, current stage, available records, site access, and the question that must be answered next.

Prepare a project brief